🎉 [Gate 30 Million Milestone] Share Your Gate Moment & Win Exclusive Gifts!
Gate has surpassed 30M users worldwide — not just a number, but a journey we've built together.
Remember the thrill of opening your first account, or the Gate merch that’s been part of your daily life?
📸 Join the #MyGateMoment# campaign!
Share your story on Gate Square, and embrace the next 30 million together!
✅ How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post a photo or video with Gate elements
2️⃣ Add #MyGateMoment# and share your story, wishes, or thoughts
3️⃣ Share your post on Twitter (X) — top 10 views will get extra rewards!
👉
Ethereum vs Solana: A Comparison of Staking Ecosystems and Business Models Analysis
Analysis of the Differences in Staking Business Models Between Ethereum and Solana
Recently, the restaking project Solayer on the Solana chain has become a market hotspot, with its TVL continuously rising, ranking twelfth on the Solana chain. This article will analyze the staking ecosystems of Ethereum and Solana, exploring the differences in their business models.
Ethereum Network's Staking Ecosystem
Lido's business logic and revenue composition
Lido, as a leading liquid staking project, mainly generates revenue from:
Eigenlayer's Restaking model
Eigenlayer introduces the concept of restaking, allowing users to re-stake their already staked ETH for additional rewards. Its business logic is:
Liquid Restaking Protocol Etherfi
Etherfi provides Liquid Restaking Tokens ( LRTs ), allowing users to participate in both staking and restaking simultaneously. Its advantages include:
Staking and Restaking of Solana
swQoS mechanism
Solana's stake-weighted Quality of Service mechanism allows stakers to gain transaction priority based on their stake amount.
Solayer's Restaking model
The restaking of Solayer is different from Eigenlayer:
Comparison of the Business Models of the Two
The staking-related protocols of Solana have the following advantages compared to Ethereum:
Overall, Solana's staking and restaking currently have more potential than Ethereum's.